<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simple automatic JSON serializer in ActionScript</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aralbalkan.com/880/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aralbalkan.com/880</link>
	<description>Passionate geekisms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:13:38 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Khelkun</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/880/comment-page-1#comment-179711</link>
		<dc:creator>Khelkun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/880#comment-179711</guid>
		<description>Hi there
I&#039;m looking on a way to improve this algo effeciency : http://www.json.org/json.as

Thanks for the work of Trannie Carter but there&#039;s seems to be a big gap of performance between this algorithm and the one we could find on some other script languages like Lua.

Is the version you give here faster than the original one ?
If not, could confirm this algorithm is really slow on a big json string ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there<br />
I&#8217;m looking on a way to improve this algo effeciency : <a href="http://www.json.org/json.as" rel="nofollow">http://www.json.org/json.as</a></p>
<p>Thanks for the work of Trannie Carter but there&#8217;s seems to be a big gap of performance between this algorithm and the one we could find on some other script languages like Lua.</p>
<p>Is the version you give here faster than the original one ?<br />
If not, could confirm this algorithm is really slow on a big json string ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aral</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/880/comment-page-1#comment-16714</link>
		<dc:creator>aral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/880#comment-16714</guid>
		<description>The final version of what I&#039;m using it for isn&#039;t JSON but it&#039;s related -- oh, the suspense ;) I hope to announce it next week, before Thursday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The final version of what I&#8217;m using it for isn&#8217;t JSON but it&#8217;s related &#8212; oh, the suspense ;) I hope to announce it next week, before Thursday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Ippolito</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/880/comment-page-1#comment-16625</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Ippolito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/880#comment-16625</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately no, I try to know as little about Wordpress as possible.

I&#039;d definitely like to see what you&#039;re cooking up. We don&#039;t do any JSON with Flash, but it&#039;d be nice if it was the easy and obvious way to do things. XML is annoying, and remoting is proprietary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately no, I try to know as little about Wordpress as possible.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d definitely like to see what you&#8217;re cooking up. We don&#8217;t do any JSON with Flash, but it&#8217;d be nice if it was the easy and obvious way to do things. XML is annoying, and remoting is proprietary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aral</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/880/comment-page-1#comment-16375</link>
		<dc:creator>aral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 07:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/880#comment-16375</guid>
		<description>Hi Bob,

Thanks for the feedback. I do share your concerns regarding the implementation but believe me there is a use case for it :) (It&#039;s going to become clearer when I release the little pet project I&#039;ve been working on for the past two weeks.) 

I&#039;ll definitely take a look at the files you mentioned and sorry the comments system messed up your code. Know any good plugins for Wordpress that handle that better?

Thanks again for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob,</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback. I do share your concerns regarding the implementation but believe me there is a use case for it :) (It&#8217;s going to become clearer when I release the little pet project I&#8217;ve been working on for the past two weeks.) </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll definitely take a look at the files you mentioned and sorry the comments system messed up your code. Know any good plugins for Wordpress that handle that better?</p>
<p>Thanks again for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Ippolito</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/880/comment-page-1#comment-16271</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Ippolito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/880#comment-16271</guid>
		<description>Oof! Your comment plugin is sure hostile to code... 

Well, look at encode_basestring_ascii in simplejson/encode.py if you want to see how I implemented the UTF-16 surrogate pair stuff.

There&#039;s also simplejson/_speedups.c that escapes characters with ascii_escape_char -- that&#039;s probably even more directly rape paste translatable to ActionScript.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oof! Your comment plugin is sure hostile to code&#8230; </p>
<p>Well, look at encode_basestring_ascii in simplejson/encode.py if you want to see how I implemented the UTF-16 surrogate pair stuff.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also simplejson/_speedups.c that escapes characters with ascii_escape_char &#8212; that&#8217;s probably even more directly rape paste translatable to ActionScript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Ippolito</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/880/comment-page-1#comment-16269</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Ippolito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/880#comment-16269</guid>
		<description>Oh, and the string escaping seems to imply that the remote end is going to understand UTF-8 properly (or whatever codec Flash encodes text with by default). It might be worth checking for text with a char code of &gt;= &#039; &#039; &amp;&amp; &gt; 10) &amp; 0x3ff)
                s2 = 0xdc00 &#124; (n &amp; 0x3ff) 
                return &#039;\\ux\\ux&#039; % (s1, s2)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and the string escaping seems to imply that the remote end is going to understand UTF-8 properly (or whatever codec Flash encodes text with by default). It might be worth checking for text with a char code of &gt;= &#8216; &#8216; &amp;&amp; &gt; 10) &amp; 0&#215;3ff)<br />
                s2 = 0xdc00 | (n &amp; 0&#215;3ff)<br />
                return &#8216;\\ux\\ux&#8217; % (s1, s2)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Ippolito</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/880/comment-page-1#comment-16268</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Ippolito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/880#comment-16268</guid>
		<description>Personally I&#039;d have done it without overriding built-in methods on the prototypes, or at least adding a different one (and making it non-enumerable). Maybe someone is already using toString for some other kind of serialization? It&#039;s also very unsafe -- serialization of anything that implements its own toString will almost surely net you an invalid JSON document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I&#8217;d have done it without overriding built-in methods on the prototypes, or at least adding a different one (and making it non-enumerable). Maybe someone is already using toString for some other kind of serialization? It&#8217;s also very unsafe &#8212; serialization of anything that implements its own toString will almost surely net you an invalid JSON document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aral</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/880/comment-page-1#comment-16183</link>
		<dc:creator>aral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/880#comment-16183</guid>
		<description>Coolness. Sorry about the typo on your nick -- fixed that too :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coolness. Sorry about the typo on your nick &#8212; fixed that too :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madarco</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/880/comment-page-1#comment-16177</link>
		<dc:creator>Madarco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/880#comment-16177</guid>
		<description>Sure, now it works fine, good work :)

Ps. my nick is mAdarco :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, now it works fine, good work :)</p>
<p>Ps. my nick is mAdarco :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aral</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/880/comment-page-1#comment-16174</link>
		<dc:creator>aral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 14:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/880#comment-16174</guid>
		<description>Hey Madarco, 

*Quite* a few lines, I apparently should&#039;ve said! :) I&#039;ve updated the post and the download. Strings should now be correctly escaped.

Now, if only we had a Character class, the code could have been simplified even further ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Madarco, </p>
<p>*Quite* a few lines, I apparently should&#8217;ve said! :) I&#8217;ve updated the post and the download. Strings should now be correctly escaped.</p>
<p>Now, if only we had a Character class, the code could have been simplified even further ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
