<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ich bin ein Berliner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aralbalkan.com/731/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aralbalkan.com/731</link>
	<description>Passionate geekisms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:33:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Bayes</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/731/comment-page-1#comment-134450</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Bayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/731#comment-134450</guid>
		<description>I always find it amusing when people choose HTML/JavaScript based purely on open source ideology. Aren&#039;t they aware that their application is executed by more than 85% of their audience in a proprietary, closed source and often standards-non-compliant runtime called Internet Explorer?

This is a runtime environment that has attempted over and over again to implement the &#039;adopt and extend&#039; philosophy of it&#039;s creator.

I&#039;m not saying that HTML and JavaScript aren&#039;t appropriate technologies, in fact I believe a vast majority of SWF content out there (including much of my own) should have been implemented as HTML. I&#039;m just saying that given the facts, the runtime license arrangement shouldn&#039;t be abused as a reason to choose HTML over SWF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always find it amusing when people choose HTML/JavaScript based purely on open source ideology. Aren&#8217;t they aware that their application is executed by more than 85% of their audience in a proprietary, closed source and often standards-non-compliant runtime called Internet Explorer?</p>
<p>This is a runtime environment that has attempted over and over again to implement the &#8216;adopt and extend&#8217; philosophy of it&#8217;s creator.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that HTML and JavaScript aren&#8217;t appropriate technologies, in fact I believe a vast majority of SWF content out there (including much of my own) should have been implemented as HTML. I&#8217;m just saying that given the facts, the runtime license arrangement shouldn&#8217;t be abused as a reason to choose HTML over SWF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aral</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/731/comment-page-1#comment-4166</link>
		<dc:creator>aral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/731#comment-4166</guid>
		<description>Yep, there seems to be only one that is getting through the spam filters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, there seems to be only one that is getting through the spam filters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tink</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/731/comment-page-1#comment-4137</link>
		<dc:creator>Tink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/731#comment-4137</guid>
		<description>&quot;could the asshole who is posting spam comments on my blog please stop&quot;

you&#039;ve only got one of em??? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;could the asshole who is posting spam comments on my blog please stop&#8221;</p>
<p>you&#8217;ve only got one of em??? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

