<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Wake-up Call: How Flash Can Lose the Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aralbalkan.com/519/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aralbalkan.com/519</link>
	<description>Aral on Flash, SWX, Flex, ActionScript, and life.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aral Balkan</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/519#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Aral Balkan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-620</guid>
		<description>Hey Sho, Mark just told me about this as well. Definitely a great move... I actually wasn't expecting it to be free (although the "limited by number of concurrent users" makes me feel like it's a developer version -- like the developer versions of FCS, etc.), just not $15,000 for a usable version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, the moves to make the compiler free and to keep the IDE reasonably priced are *great* and will no doubt attract a huge influx of new developers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having given it further thought, I guess that regardless of what the pricing for Enterprise Services ends up being, the first two decisions will bring in a large number of developers. And if Flex Enterprise Services (FES) is priced out of reach, we can still build very competent applications using plain old Flash Remoting and frameworks such as Arp and Cairngorm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do hope that AS3 remoting classes will be supplied as part of the framework and won't be limited to FES.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From what I've heard, there will be several pricing options for FES and I've gotten some very strong assurances that Adobe will be "doing the right thing" with regards to pricing so I guess all we can do is wait until there is an official announcement regarding FES pricing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to say that I'm very excited about Flex 2 in general and I truly cannot wait for Flex to become mainstream as it is such a joy to work with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sho, Mark just told me about this as well. Definitely a great move&#8230; I actually wasn&#8217;t expecting it to be free (although the &#8220;limited by number of concurrent users&#8221; makes me feel like it&#8217;s a developer version &#8212; like the developer versions of FCS, etc.), just not $15,000 for a usable version.</p>
<p>Basically, the moves to make the compiler free and to keep the IDE reasonably priced are *great* and will no doubt attract a huge influx of new developers. </p>
<p>Having given it further thought, I guess that regardless of what the pricing for Enterprise Services ends up being, the first two decisions will bring in a large number of developers. And if Flex Enterprise Services (FES) is priced out of reach, we can still build very competent applications using plain old Flash Remoting and frameworks such as Arp and Cairngorm.</p>
<p>I do hope that AS3 remoting classes will be supplied as part of the framework and won&#8217;t be limited to FES.</p>
<p>From what I&#8217;ve heard, there will be several pricing options for FES and I&#8217;ve gotten some very strong assurances that Adobe will be &#8220;doing the right thing&#8221; with regards to pricing so I guess all we can do is wait until there is an official announcement regarding FES pricing.</p>
<p>I have to say that I&#8217;m very excited about Flex 2 in general and I truly cannot wait for Flex to become mainstream as it is such a joy to work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannyT</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/519#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>DannyT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-619</guid>
		<description>Okay, take it all back! Thanks Sho!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, take it all back! Thanks Sho!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannyT</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/519#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>DannyT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-618</guid>
		<description>Hi Aral, I have been reading up ALOT this past week on flex2 and it looks great. But I totally agree with your two thirds arguement, which seems currently totally avoided by Adobe at the moment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dodgy salesman: "Here's your new dream sports car Mr Important VP1, yes that perfectly reasonable wad of cash will cover it"&lt;br /&gt;
Important VP1: "Great! its amazing! I love it! Its everything I need... now can I have the keys?"&lt;br /&gt;
Dodgy salesman: "Keys? oh no they're not part of the deal..."&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aral, I have been reading up ALOT this past week on flex2 and it looks great. But I totally agree with your two thirds arguement, which seems currently totally avoided by Adobe at the moment. </p>
<p>Dodgy salesman: &#8220;Here&#8217;s your new dream sports car Mr Important VP1, yes that perfectly reasonable wad of cash will cover it&#8221;<br />
Important VP1: &#8220;Great! its amazing! I love it! Its everything I need&#8230; now can I have the keys?&#8221;<br />
Dodgy salesman: &#8220;Keys? oh no they&#8217;re not part of the deal&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  Sho Kuwamoto</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/519#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator> Sho Kuwamoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-617</guid>
		<description>Hey Aral. Great comments. Guess what? CNet got it wrong. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be offering a version of Flex Enterprise Services for free as well. That version will be limited by number of concurrent users, and will not allow clustering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Aral. Great comments. Guess what? CNet got it wrong. </p>
<p>We will be offering a version of Flex Enterprise Services for free as well. That version will be limited by number of concurrent users, and will not allow clustering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
