<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OSFlash remix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aralbalkan.com/474/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aralbalkan.com/474</link>
	<description>Passionate geekisms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:33:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By:  Josh Tynjala</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/474/comment-page-1#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator> Josh Tynjala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-543</guid>
		<description>I usually just take a look at the Recent Changes page. That usually gives me an idea of what&#039;s new. ;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m keen on the new design Aral. While you made it more readable, I don&#039;t know if the new style reflects the OSFlash community. When I think of Flash, I think of sleek, cutting-edge sites. Similarly, the name Open Source Flash makes me think of the technology behind Flash. This new design feels bulky and overly... I&#039;m not even sure of the right word. Playful, I guess. OSFlash is a fun topic, I&#039;ll admit, but the design doesn&#039;t convey the full message I feel it should.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One other thing I&#039;d like to note. As a development wiki, the design should take up the full width of the visitor&#039;s screen. There are many pages with a lot of information that needs to breathe a bit more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually just take a look at the Recent Changes page. That usually gives me an idea of what&#8217;s new. ;)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m keen on the new design Aral. While you made it more readable, I don&#8217;t know if the new style reflects the OSFlash community. When I think of Flash, I think of sleek, cutting-edge sites. Similarly, the name Open Source Flash makes me think of the technology behind Flash. This new design feels bulky and overly&#8230; I&#8217;m not even sure of the right word. Playful, I guess. OSFlash is a fun topic, I&#8217;ll admit, but the design doesn&#8217;t convey the full message I feel it should.</p>
<p>One other thing I&#8217;d like to note. As a development wiki, the design should take up the full width of the visitor&#8217;s screen. There are many pages with a lot of information that needs to breathe a bit more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  VV</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/474/comment-page-1#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator> VV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-542</guid>
		<description>(and this &quot;feature&quot; is the main reason i had never used yahoo...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(and this &#8220;feature&#8221; is the main reason i had never used yahoo&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  Vaclav Vancura</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/474/comment-page-1#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator> Vaclav Vancura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-541</guid>
		<description>Hey Aral! The site design just lacks one feature:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
body { background-color: white }&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My win theme uses another color for panel background (gray), so it looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
http://vaclav.vancura.org/data/2005/11/aral.png&lt;br /&gt;
(what is not exactly what you do want, huh? :] )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Aral! The site design just lacks one feature:</p>
<p>body { background-color: white }</p>
<p>My win theme uses another color for panel background (gray), so it looks like this:<br />
<a href="http://vaclav.vancura.org/data/2005/11/aral.png" rel="nofollow">http://vaclav.vancura.org/data/2005/11/aral.png</a><br />
(what is not exactly what you do want, huh? :] )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aral</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/474/comment-page-1#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>aral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-538</guid>
		<description>Hi Jed, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very good suggestion. The current separation between  the wiki and the source code hosting, etc. is far from ideal. I&#039;m looking into solutions to this at the moment :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jed, </p>
<p>Very good suggestion. The current separation between  the wiki and the source code hosting, etc. is far from ideal. I&#8217;m looking into solutions to this at the moment :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jedwood</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/474/comment-page-1#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>jedwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Aral-&lt;br /&gt;
Just a quick thought: how difficult would it be to allow sorting the projects by &quot;date created&quot; and &quot;last updated.&quot; I realize &quot;last updated&quot; might not be the easiest term to define and keep track of, but I think any data would be more helpful than none. As someone who only managed to peek on the site every few weeks, I find myself looking at the alphabetized list of similar-sounding abstractly-named projects and thinking &quot;hmmm, now what was that one about?&quot; and &quot;so which projects have been added or changed sinced last time?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aral-<br />
Just a quick thought: how difficult would it be to allow sorting the projects by &#8220;date created&#8221; and &#8220;last updated.&#8221; I realize &#8220;last updated&#8221; might not be the easiest term to define and keep track of, but I think any data would be more helpful than none. As someone who only managed to peek on the site every few weeks, I find myself looking at the alphabetized list of similar-sounding abstractly-named projects and thinking &#8220;hmmm, now what was that one about?&#8221; and &#8220;so which projects have been added or changed sinced last time?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

