<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skyp&#8217;s Lust for Port 80 Revealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aralbalkan.com/401/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aralbalkan.com/401</link>
	<description>Changing the world through technology and oratory.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bilal</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/401/comment-page-1#comment-174877</link>
		<dc:creator>bilal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-174877</guid>
		<description>uyhyhxkj kll l;  ,;ckxdlxxmxwmjdfskuifdfgg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uyhyhxkj kll l;  ,;ckxdlxxmxwmjdfskuifdfgg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etienne</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/401/comment-page-1#comment-9435</link>
		<dc:creator>Etienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9435</guid>
		<description>I also found Skype doing this and after a bit of googling found out it has been a bit of an issue with any web server people run locally. My question is however why does skype bind to port 80 (or other ports?) and what hidden security risks could this pose? After all block certain IP ranges and skype's functionality starts to vanish even for IP ranges allowed by you, with multiple connections to various places I'm starting to feel a little uncomfortable with the whole "skype" idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also found Skype doing this and after a bit of googling found out it has been a bit of an issue with any web server people run locally. My question is however why does skype bind to port 80 (or other ports?) and what hidden security risks could this pose? After all block certain IP ranges and skype&#8217;s functionality starts to vanish even for IP ranges allowed by you, with multiple connections to various places I&#8217;m starting to feel a little uncomfortable with the whole &#8220;skype&#8221; idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
