<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google App Engine not blocking PayPal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aralbalkan.com/1356/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aralbalkan.com/1356</link>
	<description>Passionate geekisms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:52:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mitek</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/1356/comment-page-1#comment-154789</link>
		<dc:creator>mitek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/1356#comment-154789</guid>
		<description>Hi Aral,

It looks like you not subscribed to Slashdot
Here is the link: 
http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/31/1452238

So, if Ebay(PayPal) restricts all the payments to PayPal, why not Google to restrict payments to Google Checkout only?
Sounds logical to me.

Cheers,
Dmitri.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aral,</p>
<p>It looks like you not subscribed to Slashdot<br />
Here is the link:<br />
<a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/31/1452238" rel="nofollow">http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/31/1452238</a></p>
<p>So, if Ebay(PayPal) restricts all the payments to PayPal, why not Google to restrict payments to Google Checkout only?<br />
Sounds logical to me.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dmitri.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aral</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/1356/comment-page-1#comment-154769</link>
		<dc:creator>Aral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/1356#comment-154769</guid>
		<description>@flex: Whatever it was is not that important any more -- it was discussed publicly, Google responded, the issue has been fixed, end of story.  

That&#039;s how we deal with things on the Internet -- snap, snap! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@flex: Whatever it was is not that important any more &#8212; it was discussed publicly, Google responded, the issue has been fixed, end of story.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s how we deal with things on the Internet &#8212; snap, snap! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aral</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/1356/comment-page-1#comment-154768</link>
		<dc:creator>Aral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/1356#comment-154768</guid>
		<description>Oh and guys, I&#039;m going to fix the one white pixel issue right _after_ I launch the new Singularity teaser site on Google App Engine.

I know, I know, priorities! :) 

Seriously though, that little guy&#039;s been bothering the heck out of me too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and guys, I&#8217;m going to fix the one white pixel issue right _after_ I launch the new Singularity teaser site on Google App Engine.</p>
<p>I know, I know, priorities! :) </p>
<p>Seriously though, that little guy&#8217;s been bothering the heck out of me too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aral</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/1356/comment-page-1#comment-154766</link>
		<dc:creator>Aral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/1356#comment-154766</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Marzia, I&#039;ve updated the blog post with your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Marzia, I&#8217;ve updated the blog post with your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flex</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/1356/comment-page-1#comment-154758</link>
		<dc:creator>flex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/1356#comment-154758</guid>
		<description>Come one .. enough with the conspiracy theories already.

Of course this is a non-intentional bug. Google is not this stupid - thinking they can block PayPal without anyone noticing - *AND* if someone notices just call it a  bug. Does that sound like a plan someone at Google would come up with?

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come one .. enough with the conspiracy theories already.</p>
<p>Of course this is a non-intentional bug. Google is not this stupid &#8211; thinking they can block PayPal without anyone noticing &#8211; *AND* if someone notices just call it a  bug. Does that sound like a plan someone at Google would come up with?</p>
<p>:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Udell</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/1356/comment-page-1#comment-154695</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Udell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/1356#comment-154695</guid>
		<description>How about payments through Google&#039;s own payment system? Sounds a little to convenient to call it a bug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about payments through Google&#8217;s own payment system? Sounds a little to convenient to call it a bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xxx</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/1356/comment-page-1#comment-154627</link>
		<dc:creator>xxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/1356#comment-154627</guid>
		<description>To be fair, many phishing attacks *are* related to PayPal, so it&#039;s not obviously *complete* nonsense.

And anti-phishing solution clearly *has* to work with specific URLs, that&#039;s how you blacklist, well, specific URLs that host scam pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, many phishing attacks *are* related to PayPal, so it&#8217;s not obviously *complete* nonsense.</p>
<p>And anti-phishing solution clearly *has* to work with specific URLs, that&#8217;s how you blacklist, well, specific URLs that host scam pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Conder</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/1356/comment-page-1#comment-154618</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Conder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/1356#comment-154618</guid>
		<description>Wow, this is pretty serious.  And an error in anti-phishing that blocks specific URLs? Specifically, competitive URLs? Yikes.

They could take a service down and be like, &quot;Oops, sorry, we were just trying to be good and block phishing attempts.&quot;

Uh huh.. Thanks for the post Aral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is pretty serious.  And an error in anti-phishing that blocks specific URLs? Specifically, competitive URLs? Yikes.</p>
<p>They could take a service down and be like, &#8220;Oops, sorry, we were just trying to be good and block phishing attempts.&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh huh.. Thanks for the post Aral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marzia</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/1356/comment-page-1#comment-154613</link>
		<dc:creator>Marzia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/1356#comment-154613</guid>
		<description>Hi Aral,

We posted this on the groups, but I just wanted to follow up on your blog post as well.

This is a bug, and we have located the problem. There was an error in our anti-phishing protections that was blocking some specific URL domains from being fetched using the URLFetch service. This was an oversight on our part, and these specific domain restrictions will be removed in the next few days.

Thanks,
-Marzia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aral,</p>
<p>We posted this on the groups, but I just wanted to follow up on your blog post as well.</p>
<p>This is a bug, and we have located the problem. There was an error in our anti-phishing protections that was blocking some specific URL domains from being fetched using the URLFetch service. This was an oversight on our part, and these specific domain restrictions will be removed in the next few days.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
-Marzia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markus</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/1356/comment-page-1#comment-154612</link>
		<dc:creator>markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aralbalkan.com/1356#comment-154612</guid>
		<description>You really think this is a bug? A rival site that generates money for google being blocked is a &quot;mistake&quot;?

Hrm. Let&#039;s wait a bit before judging, but I have a slight suspicion ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really think this is a bug? A rival site that generates money for google being blocked is a &#8220;mistake&#8221;?</p>
<p>Hrm. Let&#8217;s wait a bit before judging, but I have a slight suspicion &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
