<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: INFRNO, say it ain&#8217;t so!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aralbalkan.com/103/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aralbalkan.com/103</link>
	<description>Passionate geekisms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:52:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alessandro</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/103/comment-page-1#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>alessandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Hi aral, i moved this observation to the amfphp mailing list sometime ago after reading the PHP license.&lt;br /&gt;
There it is very clear that all projects which uses PHP shouldn&#039;t use the word PHP in the project name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it&#039;s a good thing change the name according to that, even if is always a risk because of its popularity..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BTW, I like the name &quot;INFRNO&quot; even if it&#039;s not exactly a reverse acronym. But amfphp is not exactly flash remoting, macromedia never made a porting on PHP of its flash remoting.. so this is just an application which &quot;speaks&quot; the same language as macromedia flash remoting, don&#039;t you agree?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
anyway i agree also to all the amfphp developers on the fact thet once the name will be changed, a lot of propaganda will should be done in order to make it accessible to all the old amfphp users</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi aral, i moved this observation to the amfphp mailing list sometime ago after reading the PHP license.<br />
There it is very clear that all projects which uses PHP shouldn&#8217;t use the word PHP in the project name.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a good thing change the name according to that, even if is always a risk because of its popularity..</p>
<p>BTW, I like the name &#8220;INFRNO&#8221; even if it&#8217;s not exactly a reverse acronym. But amfphp is not exactly flash remoting, macromedia never made a porting on PHP of its flash remoting.. so this is just an application which &#8220;speaks&#8221; the same language as macromedia flash remoting, don&#8217;t you agree?</p>
<p>anyway i agree also to all the amfphp developers on the fact thet once the name will be changed, a lot of propaganda will should be done in order to make it accessible to all the old amfphp users</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Leggett</title>
		<link>http://aralbalkan.com/103/comment-page-1#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Leggett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Haha I&#039;m sorry, the name is a little strange, but I&#039;m still very excited, have you looked in the CVS today?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There&#039;s a lot of cool stuff in there now! Service Browser compatability, auto generation of AS2 Remoting code.  Well I&#039;ve just had a quick look but this is how it appears.  Great stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha I&#8217;m sorry, the name is a little strange, but I&#8217;m still very excited, have you looked in the CVS today?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of cool stuff in there now! Service Browser compatability, auto generation of AS2 Remoting code.  Well I&#8217;ve just had a quick look but this is how it appears.  Great stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

